I think the freewheel argument would stand up nicely if there were
high quality parts available today. I know that Phil hub is a thing of
beauty and I'd make the sacrifice if I wanted one. But the world has
changed. Even good quality 8 speed cassettes are hard to find ( yes
I'm hoarding some of those) these days and I don't like that.
Time to move on and shift your paradigm to the 8-9 speed cassette for
now.  You can still get be retro on 8 speeds if that's your thang.

~mike

On Jun 9, 4:52 pm, MichaelH <mhech...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I stuck with freewheels for a long time.  Probably, mostly because I
> already had a bunch of perfectly good hubs, not to mention frames with
> 126 mm rear spacing.  I especially found 7 speed freewheels (13-28)
> with a 50/40/28 very nice on my touring bikes.
>
>  I struggled through the dry period of increasingly hard to find
> freewheels.  Eventually, I bought a set of wheels with a 9 speed,
> 12-27 cassette.  I found that I really liked the ability to use 12 and
> then 11 toothed cassettes because I could reduce the size of the
> rings.  Eventually I migrated to a 44/30 crank with an 11-28 cassette
> or 12-27 with 48/34/26 triples.  The former gave me the same low as a
> racing triple by only giving up one gear at the top, and the latter
> gives me a good shifting pattern, a pretty low mid gear and a great
> escape, which I can't get with a freewheel.
>
> Cassettes are indeed easier to remove that freewheels, but I don't
> think its a big deal, although I admit to having stripped the threads
> on on one free hub.  I do have two complaints about cassettes.  First,
> the low end ones don't shift reliably in 9 speed mode.  They don't
> hold the chain and jump around.  I have not found this to be a problem
> with the better Ultegra and HG cassettes.  Second, they are harder to
> clean.  I use to simply run a thin strip of cloth between cogs to
> clean up freewheels, but that doesn't work with cassettes.  And to
> boot, Shimano has drilled a gazillion  little holes in the cogs which
> collect muck and are very difficult to clean.
>
> michael,
> take care of Self; it's one of a kind and irreplaceable
>
> On Jun 8, 12:44 pm, Jim Cloud <cloud...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > With the subject of freewheels on a recent post, I thought it would be
> > of some interest to quote a piece of Rivendell history from the first
> > Rivendell catalog (Summer 1996).
>
> > "Freewheels
>
> > "We don't sell cassettes.  There's nothing wrong with cassettes, but
> > there's something fishy about the way they're promoted.  Cassettes
> > support axles better, so you don't break axles; but Bullseye, Phil and
> > others have proven that you can totally eliminate axle-flex and
> > breakages with a better designed freewheel hub.  More likely, the real
> > reason cassettes have overtaken freewheels is to increase production
> > efficiency for the large hub makers.  We and many others find
> > freewheels quicker and easier to change than cassettes; and freewheels
> > certainly have versatility on their side.  Freewheel availability has
> > got to be a concern for anybody with freewheel hubs.  Cassettes change
> > often enough to make year-to-year compatibility an issue, so it's not
> > as though once you've got your cassette body, you'll always be able to
> > get the cogs.  But there's little incentive for anybody who ever made
> > freewheels to continue making them.  Shimano still makes one cheap
> > model, SunTour is history.  Regina-the company still exists, but we
> > hear they're making conveyor belts or something.  Sachs, the great
> > German hope, still offers a full line of freewheels, but the word is
> > they'd like to cut back their selection.  Factories see freewheels as
> > money-eaters."
>
> > I don't wish to insinuate that something Grant Peterson wrote in 1996
> > is representative of his present opinion.  It's still interesting,
> > however, to see how some (including me) would have chosen a freewheel
> > equipped bike at that time in preference of a cassette.  I'm
> > personally quite satisfied with the choice I made for my 1996
> > Rivendell Standard and feel that its given me good service and will
> > continue to do so in the future.
>
> > Jim Cloud
> > Tucson, AZ- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

Reply via email to