On Apr 15, 1:34 pm, Ron MH <visio...@gmail.com> wrote: > The bottom line is > that I don't want to mess up the non-loaded handling.
That's what I would worry with in re-raking the stock fork. I love how my QB handles as is. As my daily commuter, my typical load goes in the large rear saddlesack, but several days a week something finds it's way onto the front rack (Platrack/Nitto Mini combo). The 5 points of attachment make for an uber solid and secure front rack system. Unloaded, all that front rack-age is unnoticeable while riding. Non-ridiculous loads are no problem either. Only when carrying big bulky boxes or a really heavy load (stack of library books) do I notice handling differences. Anyway, that's my experience. Let us know what you end up doing. Glad you're okay and you're getting the QB back on the road soon. FWIW, this is an interesting read from Tom Matchak http://tinyurl.com/6peypt I have no experience with his "frame neutral replacement forks" but thought I'd pass along the site in case you hadn't seen it. best, -Jay B. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
