"The White Industry crank & BB is $100 less":

True, sort of.  $85 less if you choose a steel BB.  $25 less of you
choose a Ti BB

"The White Industry crank & BB is a 100 grams less":

False.  White Crank 665g. White Steel BB 226g.  White Ti BB 165g.  So
830g total or 891g total.  That Sugino is 787g for everything.

"The White Industry crank & BB is far more versatile":

How so?  I'd call this a push.  The White can run any of 8 proprietary
big rings and anything with 5 bolts as a small ring.  The Sugino can
run essentially anything in 110mm as a big ring (which is a number
greater than 8), and anything in 110 or 74 as a small ring.  The only
thing that comes to mind that you can't run on the Sugino is a 22T
small ring.  Among the things you can't run on the White is a 53T big
ring, or a 54.

"The White Industry crank & BB is better looking":

To each his own, but I think they are both very attractive in very
different ways.

"The White Industry crank & BB is made in the USA to boot"

Absolutely true.  And they are nice on the phone.

FWIW, if I received either crankset for my birthday coming up on Feb
8th, I would be thrilled.  :)

My OP was just to point out that the Sugino one is actually available
in the US, which is something I doubted would happen.  It's cool that
there are options.

On Jan 21, 1:58 pm, MichaelH <mhech...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The White Industry crank & BB is $100 less, a 100 grams less, far more
> versitle, better looking, and made in the USA to boot.
> michael
>
> On Jan 21, 3:05 pm, Michael_S <mikeybi...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The only concern I would have with that combination is the lack of a
> > real low gear. There are climbs I do, especially on dirt roads, that
> > something like a 24-28 or 30 is far easier to maintain for a 30 min.
> > duration then would be a 30-28.  On shorter climbs you can get out of
> > the saddle to help and most paved roads are designed and built with
> > reasonable grades.
>
> > I wish there were some curently available cranks in the 94bcd, it
> > seems to me the perfect design for a compact double without all the
> > extra bolts of the TA.
>
> > ~Mike
>
> > On Jan 21, 11:11 am, William <tapebu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > I'm running a 44/30 on a 94mm bolt circle with an 11-28 9 speed
> > > cassette and it's spectacular.  I can cruise easily at 20kph in the
> > > middle of the cogset on the 30.  I can cruise quickly at 20mph in the
> > > middle of the cogset on the 44.  My highest gear is a 44-11 and I can
> > > spin that out on a decent and be right at 40mph, beyond which I always
> > > have been happy to coast.  I'm going to try 46/29 sometime (I already
> > > have the rings), but so far so good.  With a double, the chainline
> > > allows all 18 combinations to be used, although I still avoid the two
> > > extreme crosschain combinations (44-28 and 30-11).  16 totally usable
> > > gears with basically zero overlaps.  Furthermore, with the Campy
> > > compact double front der that Riv sells, my setup miraculously is 99%
> > > trim free.  It's great treating your front shifting like a switch,
> > > instead of gently trying to hit the middle (and, yes, I have a number
> > > of bikes with a triple.  I know how to shift a triple).  On a bike
> > > that won't be heavily loaded, I think having 16 usable and well-spaced
> > > gears between 28 and 104 gear inches is plenty.
>
> > > On Jan 21, 7:24 am, Michael_S <mikeybi...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > For some reason I still prefer triples. On a long sustained climb in
> > > > the mountains I find I fatigue less easily if I spin at a certain
> > > > cadence and force.  I also prefer something in the 38-40 tooth range
> > > > for most flatish riding. Coming down long gradual mountians a ring in
> > > > the 48-50 range gives me a nice steady pace.  It also allows a tighter
> > > > frewheel/cassette so it's easier to find a nice combinatioin in every
> > > > terrrain.
>
> > > > The one thing I need to try is something like a 44-29 to see if the 44
> > > > can meet most conditions. I have been scouring EBAY looking for 94bcd
> > > > cranks so I can cobble something together to try it out.
>
> > > > And $500+ for a crankset seems crazy to me .
>
> > > > ~Mike
>
> > > > On Jan 20, 10:27 pm, rinjin <feltov...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > Ah, I see. Well if one of those combinations makes sense for you and
> > > > > you need to save some grams over the VO setup then I guess this makes
> > > > > a certain kind of sense. For a light-ish road bike I'm pretty happy
> > > > > with my 50-34 setup.
>
> > > > > Brian
>
> > > > > On Jan 20, 10:07 pm, Earl Grey <earlg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > The cool thing about the 801 is that it has 74 BCD holes as far out 
> > > > > > as
> > > > > > where the inner chainring sits (I 
> > > > > > think):http://www.suginoltd.co.jp/english/ox801d_main_english.htm
> > > > > > (A little hard to tell from the website, but if you look at the 
> > > > > > left-
> > > > > > most bolt hole in the third photo you can see that a 74 BCD ring 
> > > > > > would
> > > > > > replace the inner ring; i.e. this is not a triple.)
>
> > > > > > So you can replace the inner 110 BCD ring with a 74 BCD ring and 
> > > > > > run a
> > > > > > wide range double with an inner ring down to 24 teeth. A pretty cool
> > > > > > idea, and if they make an XD2/XD600 variant like this, I'll buy it 
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > a heartbeat. As far as what's available now, I'd rather get the VO 
> > > > > > TA
> > > > > > copy; cheaper and prettier IMO.
>
> > > > > > Gernot
>
> > > > > > On Jan 21, 11:37 am, rinjin <feltov...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > I don't mind the looks so much, but the price seems a little 
> > > > > > > high. Is
> > > > > > > there an advantage over a Campy 10s crankset, either Veloce or
> > > > > > > Centaur, with PowerTorque? Like this:http://tinyurl.com/4logk38. 
> > > > > > > And
> > > > > > > about $300 cheaper. What am I missing? Low Q factor?
>
> > > > > > > Brian
> > > > > > > Park City
>
> > > > > > > On Jan 20, 2:40 pm, William <tapebu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > >http://store.somafab.com/suoxcoplrocr.html
>
> > > > > > > > Soma Fab actually has the Sugino OX801D in stock.  Crankset and 
> > > > > > > > BB for
> > > > > > > > a whopping $529.  Way too expensive for many of us, and too
> > > > > > > > spaceshippy looking for many of us.  That's about what I 
> > > > > > > > thought it
> > > > > > > > would cost.  Somebody building a totally tricked-out Roadeo 
> > > > > > > > should run
> > > > > > > > these and show them off.  High-end road bits can still be 
> > > > > > > > carbon-free
> > > > > > > > if they want to be.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

Reply via email to