I'm pretty stoked about the longer tt.  The 58 was the right length, but not
enough standover.   Plus I didn't want the double tt (I like flexy bikes!).
The 54 had the right standover, but wasn't long enough.  Voila, now a 54 is
back in play for me!

On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 3:27 PM, happyriding <happyrid...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On May 4, 12:47 pm, William <tapebu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Mike
> >
> > I'm a terrible double-replyer, so I'm sorry about that.  I just called
> > Keven and he said that the 54 and 58 prototypes were built correctly
> > to the numbers that are currently on the Riv-site.  The finals will be
> > longer, so the numbers are changing.  The Hunqa numbers claim that the
> > 54 has a 58.4cm effective top tube length, and the final will be
> > really close to 60cm.  The 58 claims to have a 60cm effective top tube
> > length and the final will be a 62 or so.
> >
> On May 4, 12:47 pm, William <tapebu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Mike
> >
> > I'm a terrible double-replyer, so I'm sorry about that.  I just called
> > Keven and he said that the 54 and 58 prototypes were built correctly
> > to the numbers that are currently on the Riv-site.  The finals will be
> > longer, so the numbers are changing.  The Hunqa numbers claim that the
> > 54 has a 58.4cm effective top tube length, and the final will be
> > really close to 60cm.  The 58 claims to have a 60cm effective top tube
> > length and the final will be a 62 or so.
> >
>
> Ugh.  What is it with Rivendell's long top tubes?  I thought the whole
> idea was to get people to ride bigger frames?  On the bigger frames,
> the top tubes are so long it forces people to buy a smaller frame with
> a shorter, better fitting top tube and then jack up the stem to get
> the bars up there.   For instance, look at the 67 AHH.  The effective
> seat tube is about 66.3 center to center and the effective top tube is
> 65.  My preference for that frame would be a 61 cm top tube so that I
> could employ a proportionally appropriate stem of 12 or 13 cm.
>
> It seems to me that because of the long top tubes most of Rivendells
> frames are not designed for drop bars.  With the long top tubes you
> need bars that come back towards you to provide a comfortable reach.
>
> I've read the article on how a shallower seat angle effectively
> shortens the top tube--but that is only 1 cm per degree.  So if you
> currently ride a bike with a 73 seat tube angle, the Hilsen's 72 seat
> tube angle will allow you to fit a top tube that is 1 cm longer.  But
> on the other end, a Nitto Noodle handlebar has 9.5 cm of reach which
> is 1 cm longer than most road bars sold today.   The net result is
> that a shallower seat tube angle effectively reduces the top tube
> length by 1cm, but the Noodle handlebar is 1 cm longer, so that is a
> scratch.
>
> It would be nice if Rivendell made one model where the top tubes were
> not so long in the large sizes.  Taller riders could then choose
> bigger frames with less stem sticking out of the frame and use a 12 or
> 13 cm stem with Nitto Noodle's to get the proper reach to the bars.
> The geometry of the original Hunqapillar seemed to be moving a bit in
> that direction.
>
> On the other hand, some days I hold up my hand and spread my thumb and
> forefinger apart 4 centimeters, and I look at how small a distance
> that is, and I wonder if it is even worth thinking about.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
> To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<rbw-owners-bunch%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
>
>


-- 
Cheers,
David
Redlands, CA

"Bicycling is a big part of the future. It has to be. There is something
wrong with a society that drives a car to workout in a gym."  ~Bill Nye,
scientist guy

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

Reply via email to