Mike I'm a terrible double-replyer, so I'm sorry about that. I just called Keven and he said that the 54 and 58 prototypes were built correctly to the numbers that are currently on the Riv-site. The finals will be longer, so the numbers are changing. The Hunqa numbers claim that the 54 has a 58.4cm effective top tube length, and the final will be really close to 60cm. The 58 claims to have a 60cm effective top tube length and the final will be a 62 or so.
Bill On May 4, 11:14 am, Michael_S <mikeybi...@rocketmail.com> wrote: > Will the 54 still be a single top tube or will it have the diagonal > tube also? > If what Keven says is true I should get the 54 also ( 86 PBH but long > torso/arms). > Any news on the delivery date of the final production versions? > > ~Mike~ > > On May 4, 11:04 am, William <tapebu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Jim > > > I just did the same thing this morning (rode the 54 and 58), and had > > the same reaction (I liked the cockpit size of the 58 but was freaked > > at the standover). My PBH is 87. Keven pointed out to me that the > > final 58 will be 2 full centimeters longer in the top tube, and the 54 > > will be 1.5cm longer than the proto 54. That has me leaning towards > > the 54. > > > Bill > > > On May 4, 9:58 am, "Jim M." <mather...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > That design sure looks like this photoshop proto by > > > Marty:http://www.flickr.com/photos/32306...@n07/4492630025/in/pool-1358...@n23 > > > > My PBH is on the cusp of 54/58. I test rode both last Saturday. Both > > > are great handling, stable bikes but I prefer the 58. The 54 feels > > > just a little cramped for my taste. > > > > jim m > > > wc ca > > > > On May 3, 3:54 pm, William <tapebu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > The Hunqapage on the Rivsite now has a photo of the design sheet for > > > > the Diagonal 2TT. > > > > >http://www.rivbike.com/products/show/hunqapillar/50-713 > > > > > In related news, Grant's post about the ropeswing says that the 54 is > > > > now built and being ridden. > > > > >http://www.rivbike.com/blogs/news_post/236 > > > > > -- > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > > Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. > > > > To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com. > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > > > For more options, visit this group > > > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en. > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > > "RBW Owners Bunch" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > > For more options, visit this group > > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "RBW Owners Bunch" group. > > To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.-Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "RBW Owners Bunch" group. > To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.