Umm,  the differences are not so much in the frames but in what you want, 
and that you are undecided of what you want.  I see no "class" of Rivendell 
frames, no matter who builds them or how much you pay.  Heck, a frame is a 
frame, a bike is a bike, ride it or not.... rather simple really. 



On Monday, March 13, 2017 at 11:03:34 AM UTC-4, Davey Two Shoes wrote:
>
> Hello Everyone! 
> I'm new here, but my love of Rivendells is not!
> I'm getting ready to get my first Riv and its likely to be a Clemy or an 
> Appaloosa. I have ridden a Clem and I enjoyed it quite a bit, I have not 
> rode an Appaloosa. Lugwork and aesthetics aside what are the real 
> differences between the two bikes? They seem pretty similar to each other 
> with their long geometry and wheel configurations. I understand the Clem is 
> meant to be more of an everyday commuter and the Appaloosa more of a 
> tourer, but is this just waxing poetic? What I'm really asking about, I 
> guess, is the difference in ride character between the two bikes, or are 
> they akin to an entry level vs fully loaded version of the same vehicle.
>
> Thanks guys!
> Dave
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to