On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 4:23 PM, R Gonet<richard.go...@earthlink.net> wrote: > > Apparently Sigg was selling aluminum water bottles with an interior > coating containing bisphenol, which is supposed to be a bad thing. > Grant has a post on the RBW site about this, under the Rivendell News > section. Sigg is replacing these bottles and Grant suggests that you > send them back to Sigg, but because RBW sold them, Grant is also > willing to assist in the exchange (read the article for details). > Grant is apologetic for having sold them - his term is "guilty by > association" - but RBW was misled by Sigg, too. I would not think of > returning a bottle to RBW under these circumstances and I give great > credit to Grant's taking some responsibility, even though I think he > does not need to. But that's just another example of why we support > RBW. And I would never buy another Sigg product, to punish them for > their deception
'deception'? You sure it's deception? The way I read it they never claimed the other bottles were bpa-free. Just not leaking any bpa. They've gotten in trouble b/c the perception was that their bottles were bpa-free. It doesn't feel like deception - it feels like the normal crap you go through when something is very complicated. -sv --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
