Grant's post was painfully altruistic, at least to my "ear." Too bad SIGG mishandled this -- its employees and merchants deserve better, and, of course, its customers.
For what its worth, I have a wonderful double-walled ss SIGG bottle that I use all the time for riding with hot coffee to work and for keeping water cold on long rides (I save it for last). Its stellar, and no liner. On Sep 4, 1:23 pm, R Gonet <richard.go...@earthlink.net> wrote: > Apparently Sigg was selling aluminum water bottles with an interior > coating containing bisphenol, which is supposed to be a bad thing. > Grant has a post on the RBW site about this, under the Rivendell News > section. Sigg is replacing these bottles and Grant suggests that you > send them back to Sigg, but because RBW sold them, Grant is also > willing to assist in the exchange (read the article for details). > Grant is apologetic for having sold them - his term is "guilty by > association" - but RBW was misled by Sigg, too. I would not think of > returning a bottle to RBW under these circumstances and I give great > credit to Grant's taking some responsibility, even though I think he > does not need to. But that's just another example of why we support > RBW. And I would never buy another Sigg product, to punish them for > their deception --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
