On Feb 18, 2009, at 3:51 PM, Andrew Karre wrote:
> RGZ: I don't find the test designs in BQ lacking, actually. The wind > tunnel test was excellent and I know some people I respect are dubious > about the tire test, but it makes a lot more sense to me than a steel > drum. Where I have quibbles is more in interpretation of the data. But > that's relatively minor. BQ is an enormously useful resource, even if > I find myself disagreeing with its conclusions. The benefit is that Jan makes you think about these things which is beneficial even if you end up disagreeing with his conclusions. I find the same thing in Grant's writing over the years- I may come to a different conclusion but at least he made me think about it. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
