Ah yes. Larger sizes. See, one thing is that my 62 cm RB-2 is a bit too small 
for me, but I find ways to tolerate that. What would be fun is a 65 cm RivB-1. 
That would be awesome!

-Jim

-----Original Message-----
>From: Jeremy Till <jeremy.t...@gmail.com>
>Sent: Jan 18, 2009 11:26 AM
>To: RBW Owners Bunch <rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com>
>Subject: [RBW] Re: Rivendell Bike Models Page - some updates
>
>
>I think that it's not so much a matter of frame weight, stiffness, or
>tire size/brake reach so much as having a bike optimized for road
>riding.  The RB-1 demonstrates (and I'm going on hearsay here, because
>I've never ridden one myself) that Grant can design a bike optimized
>for road riding that seems to be pretty uniformly perceived as faster,
>more "sporty" on decent roads with ultralight loads than the current
>crop of Riv bikes which are optimized for touring/load carrying, mixed-
>terrain, and wide tires.  There is debate as to whether or not the Ram/
>Rom replicates this effect.  Some people would appreciate a riv bike
>that got back to Grant's RB-1 roots, although Jim makes the point that
>such a bike would be competing which many more mainstream offerings
>and as such is harder to justify from a market perspective.  So it's
>really a matter of how Grant/Riv identify their current market.
>
>As for I, I guess I'm one of those "reformed hipsters" (although I
>originally got into cycling through touring and long rides) that is
>now looking for more practical steeds.  I would have seriously
>considered something like the Ram/Rom a year ago had Riv still been
>making it, although its vertical dropouts would have been a drawback
>for me.  While I'm a reformed hipsters I still like riding fixed gear
>and singlespeed.  And old rb-1 would have been similarly great, but
>they're pretty hard to come by these days, especially in larger sizes
>that I could use.  What did i get?  I bought a Salsa Casseroll, which
>has built up into a great, sporty fixed gear road bike for 700x28
>(true) tires with great geometry.
>
>
>
>On Jan 18, 10:43 am, MichaelH <mhech...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Those of us, like myself, who can afford more than one bike, often
>> prefer to have bikes optimized around specific kinds of riding.  In
>> that case a "go  fast" road bike - one designed for centuries or
>> shorter rides without carrying a lot of gear, and with nimble road
>> manners makes a lot of sense.
>>
>> I still have and ride a custom 1988 ,full campy, tubular tired,
>> Marinoni stage racing bike.  This bike is built out of standard guage
>> Columbus tubing and sports a World Championship heritage.  I also have
>> a Ram, outfitted with RP tires, Honjo fenders, and a small Carradice
>> bag.  Theses bike have amazingly similar rides.  The Ram is a little
>> more stable, less quick handling, but it climbs, descends and responds
>> much like the Marinoni.  So I'm skeptical of the argument that
>> standard guage  bikes plane better than OS tubing ones.  Maybe for a
>> 145 lb rider, but not for a 175 lb rider.  I have a standard guage
>> early Trek which planes nicely too, as does my OS Ebisu All Purpose.
>> My winter and off road bike - a Soma Dble X definitely bogs down going
>> uphill.  Whatever causes a bike frame to respond to rider input is
>> something other than just tubing dimension.  I suspect overly stiff
>> tubes as the culprit.
>>
>> Bottom line, the Ram, with OS tubing and nimble geometry serves a
>> unique and joyful purpose.  I hope Grant decides to bring it back so
>> more people can discover what fun it is to ride this bike.
>>
>> On Jan 18, 12:10 pm, "Lisa -S.H." <harmo...@fairpoint.net> wrote:
>>
>> > I don't think it's accurate or fair to categorize those who ride 25c
>> > tires and like to (or would like to) ride fast(er) as either a "roadie"
>> > or a "weight weenie".   Heck, I found my original 38c tires were
>> > overkill for me, and I like to ride both slow AND fast.  (though
>> > admittedly my 'fast' is probably equivalent  to most other people's
>> > 'slow')     ;)
>> > Just my two cents.
>> > Lisa
>>


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to