On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 11:26:06AM -0700, Wesley Kerfoot wrote: > Has anyone considered http://shriram.github.io/p4p/ as an alternative? > > The idea in a nutshell is to get rid of the implicit `(begin ...)` that > many of the forms have, and use that to reduce the number of required > parentheses for parsing, and add in some extra syntactic sugar in the form > of `:` (colon) to further reduce the need for parens.
Does current Racket already have a meaning for ':'? Are there any other characters that are still free? -- hendrik -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/20190715210333.k5indts2wovi5hec%40topoi.pooq.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
