Matthew Flatt wrote on 07/04/2015 06:40 PM:
That is, unlike so many other things in our infrastructure, the GC is
not so tangled with everything else that it would be difficult to
change by itself. Granted,
Good about GC not so tangled.
I don't know the current state of GC research, nor what GC ideas PLTers
could come up with, but maybe there is a doctoral dissertation, or at
least some MS projects, waiting to happen.
Separate from research activity, anyone know of existing off-the-shelf
GCs that would be interesting to hook up to Racket?
GC implementation can be fairly challenging on its own.
Systems programming is hard, as you know. :)
Neil V.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
