This doesn't count as "soon", but I finally cleaned up my patch for this: https://github.com/plt/racket/pull/729
It's not as general as what Alexander envisioned, so it should probably be generalized. Sam On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@cs.indiana.edu> wrote: > I've written 75% of a patch for this, so hopefully we'll have it soon. > > Sam > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: >> I think `prop:object-name` would be a good addition, but it doesn't >> exist right now. >> >> At Wed, 30 Apr 2014 16:35:06 -0400, "Alexander D. Knauth" wrote: >>> What do you mean? I tried it and it didn’t affect the object-name. >>> >>> And what I’m looking for is something that could be different for different >>> instances of the same structure type, for example: >>> (struct thing (name) #:property prop:object-name (struct-field-index name)) >>> >>> (struct proc-with-string (proc str) >>> #:property prop:procedure (struct-field-index proc) >>> #:property prop:object-name (lambda (this) >>> (object-name (proc-with-string-proc this))) >>> #:property prop:custom-write (lambda (this out mode) >>> (display (proc-with-string-str this) out))) >>> >>> >>> On Apr 30, 2014, at 9:26 AM, Stephen Chang <stch...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: >>> >>> > Does the #:extra-constructor-name keyword argument to struct do what >>> > you're >>> looking for? >>> > >>> > On Apr 29, 2014 9:31 PM, "Alexander D. Knauth" <alexan...@knauth.org> >>> > wrote: >>> > I’m just curious is there something like a prop:object-name that the >>> object-name function would use when returning the object name of a struct >>> with >>> that property? >>> > >>> > >>> > ____________________ >>> > Racket Users list: >>> > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users >>> >>> ____________________ >>> Racket Users list: >>> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users >> >> ____________________ >> Racket Users list: >> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
