I've written 75% of a patch for this, so hopefully we'll have it soon. Sam
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: > I think `prop:object-name` would be a good addition, but it doesn't > exist right now. > > At Wed, 30 Apr 2014 16:35:06 -0400, "Alexander D. Knauth" wrote: >> What do you mean? I tried it and it didn’t affect the object-name. >> >> And what I’m looking for is something that could be different for different >> instances of the same structure type, for example: >> (struct thing (name) #:property prop:object-name (struct-field-index name)) >> >> (struct proc-with-string (proc str) >> #:property prop:procedure (struct-field-index proc) >> #:property prop:object-name (lambda (this) >> (object-name (proc-with-string-proc this))) >> #:property prop:custom-write (lambda (this out mode) >> (display (proc-with-string-str this) out))) >> >> >> On Apr 30, 2014, at 9:26 AM, Stephen Chang <stch...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: >> >> > Does the #:extra-constructor-name keyword argument to struct do what you're >> looking for? >> > >> > On Apr 29, 2014 9:31 PM, "Alexander D. Knauth" <alexan...@knauth.org> >> > wrote: >> > I’m just curious is there something like a prop:object-name that the >> object-name function would use when returning the object name of a struct >> with >> that property? >> > >> > >> > ____________________ >> > Racket Users list: >> > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users >> >> ____________________ >> Racket Users list: >> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users > > ____________________ > Racket Users list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
