I think `prop:object-name` would be a good addition, but it doesn't exist right now.
At Wed, 30 Apr 2014 16:35:06 -0400, "Alexander D. Knauth" wrote: > What do you mean? I tried it and it didn’t affect the object-name. > > And what I’m looking for is something that could be different for different > instances of the same structure type, for example: > (struct thing (name) #:property prop:object-name (struct-field-index name)) > > (struct proc-with-string (proc str) > #:property prop:procedure (struct-field-index proc) > #:property prop:object-name (lambda (this) > (object-name (proc-with-string-proc this))) > #:property prop:custom-write (lambda (this out mode) > (display (proc-with-string-str this) out))) > > > On Apr 30, 2014, at 9:26 AM, Stephen Chang <stch...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > > > Does the #:extra-constructor-name keyword argument to struct do what you're > looking for? > > > > On Apr 29, 2014 9:31 PM, "Alexander D. Knauth" <alexan...@knauth.org> wrote: > > I’m just curious is there something like a prop:object-name that the > object-name function would use when returning the object name of a struct > with > that property? > > > > > > ____________________ > > Racket Users list: > > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users > > ____________________ > Racket Users list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
