A few minutes ago, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > > For 81 slots, I'd actually use a (define b (make-vector 81 0)) > instead and use an access polynomial. I am almost certain that it is > faster.
(+1; I forgot to say that keeping the vector-of-vectors private will
make such a change easy...)
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
____________________
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
