;; Instead of needing to write...
(define a 1)
(define b 2)
(define c 3)
;; ...it would be clean to write...
(def a 1
b 2
c 3)
;; ...which is even cleaner than the `let' that `define' replaces.
;; Plus, having it act like `match-define' would be handy:
(def a 1
b 2
(list x y) '(1 2)
(list _ hi world) (regexp-match #px"(.+)\\s+(.+)"
"Hello, world."))
Sprit being, take the motivation from the style guide for preferring
the new `define' over `let', and run it just a few steps further.
But, just a small idea.
____________________
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
