On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:26 PM, ozzloy-racket-users <ozzloy+users_racket-lang_...@gmail.com> wrote: > am i the only one that thinks not having abbreviated names for anything is > good?
no. > i like not having "def". especially if it's going to be redundant. > i see this as a slippery slope i don't want to go down. > it annoys me when switching to other languages to have to ask: which way of > shortening "function" does this language go with? was it "fn"? maybe "fun"? > if the language has a strict policy of not using short versions of words, i > don't have to guess. *APPLAUSE* P. ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
