On Aug 29, 2011, at 2:10 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote: > Four hours ago, Matthias Felleisen wrote: >> >> On Aug 29, 2011, at 6:06 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote: >> >>> I >>> don't see a problem with deciding that >>> >>> (test (dynamic-wind foo (λ () X) baz) Y) >>> >>> is the test case instead of having `test' construct the extra code. >> >> What if a 100 programmers write a 100 test cases with this pattern: >> >> (test (dynamic-wind <foo:p.n> (lambda () <X:p.n>) <baz:p.n>) <Y:p.n>) >> >> Where should this abstraction be defined? -- Matthias > > The answer is in the part you snipped. What's better (assuming some > better name than `before/after'): > > (test #:before foo #:after bar X Y) > > (test (before/after foo bar X) Y)
block or protected _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
