Four hours ago, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> On Aug 29, 2011, at 6:06 AM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>
> > I
> > don't see a problem with deciding that
> >
> > (test (dynamic-wind foo (λ () X) baz) Y)
> >
> > is the test case instead of having `test' construct the extra code.
>
> What if a 100 programmers write a 100 test cases with this pattern:
>
> (test (dynamic-wind <foo:p.n> (lambda () <X:p.n>) <baz:p.n>) <Y:p.n>)
>
> Where should this abstraction be defined? -- Matthias
The answer is in the part you snipped. What's better (assuming some
better name than `before/after'):
(test #:before foo #:after bar X Y)
(test (before/after foo bar X) Y)
?
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
