On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 6:05 AM, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote: > >> I'm certainly happy to have Racket extended with before/after/around >> forms that are conveniences for dynamic-wind. Us humble test package >> authors aren't really in a position to do this, however. > > Yeah, that's a valid point. If it's the *only* one for adding a > before/after to a testing facility, then the only problem I have with > it is in making it easier for the core developers to not face the > problem.
Not that I'm in charge of the `dynamic-wind' API, but I would think that the way to learn what the best API would be in the future is to *learn from* wrappers like those we're talking about here, rather than avoiding wrappers. -- sam th sa...@ccs.neu.edu _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
