I think it is very useful to be able to test that your macro has good syntax errors.
Jay 2011/2/17 Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@ccs.neu.edu>: > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Jakub Piotr Cłapa <jpc...@zenburn.net> wrote: >> I don't think that having to use a separate form just to test macros would >> be a bad idea. > > The primary hard part about testing macros is not syntax errors, but > writing an "alpha-equvialent-to" comparison function, which to my > knowledge has not ever been written in Racket. > -- > sam th > sa...@ccs.neu.edu > > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users -- Jay McCarthy <j...@cs.byu.edu> Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~jay "The glory of God is Intelligence" - D&C 93 _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
