40 minutes ago, Stephen Bloch wrote:
>
> On Feb 14, 2011, at 5:00 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>
> > I figured that
> > a much better solution to avoid some new `/=>' is to have instead a
> > new `true' so that (test E => true) works for any non-#f value.
>
> Umm... isn't redefining "true" sorta like redefining pi to equal 3?
No.
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
