On Feb 14, 2011, at 5:00 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote: > I figured that > a much better solution to avoid some new `/=>' is to have instead a > new `true' so that (test E => true) works for any non-#f value.
Umm... isn't redefining "true" sorta like redefining pi to equal 3? If you're going to create such a magic value, PLEASE call it "non-false" or something instead of "true". Stephen Bloch sbl...@adelphi.edu _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
