It's been on my to-do list, and bumping up in priority. Shriram
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 7:04 AM, Neil Van Dyke <n...@neilvandyke.org> wrote: > Mathew, you'll find lots of programming and even CS texts, including > contemporary ones, that talk about "interpreted vs. compiled". > > However, as you have learned, these definitions are reviled on the Racket > list and other CS places. > > Every time someone who has read of these definitions asks which Racket is, > they are admonished severely. You are not the first, and you won't be the > last. > > There should really be a pararaph in one of the Racket manuals about this. > Then some people will read it and be pre-empted, and others can merely have > have the URL pasted to them. > > -- > http://www.neilvandyke.org/ > > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users > _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
