In response to synx and Professor Bloch: As long as the processor can only read only numbers (binary), Racket cannot be interpreted by the machine before being translated into another language such as Assembly. Assembly is then translated to numbers or binary/machine code If that is the case, Racket has to be an interpreted language since it is layered on Assembly. Or I may just be completely wrong in my perception of that part.
In response to Professor Bloch: How can those researched numbers be random? It can only LOOK random, but not ACTUALLY random. Right? Sincerely, Mathew Kurian -- Mathew Kurian Seven Lakes High School Cell: 8324932862 | Home: 2814929526 Do all the good you can, by all the means you can, In all the ways you can, in all the places you can, At all the times you can, to all the people you can, As long as ever you can." :) John Wesley *Please be sure to visit SLHS Red Cross Association<http://www.slhsredcross.com> *
_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
