On Jun 27, 2010, at 6:32 PM, Brad Long wrote: > Dear racketeers, > > What is the reason for not offering a looping construct in racket? For > example, something like: > > (loop (i 1 10) (print i)) >
It's there: (for/list ([i (in-range 1 10)]) i) prints out '(1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9) ... also, note that 'for/list' contains no opiates. John
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
