Plus loops per se are evil -- opium for the masses if you so wish. -- Matthias
On Jun 27, 2010, at 9:34 PM, Robby Findler wrote: > Please see 'for' in the docs. Here's the relevant section of the Guide: > > http://docs.racket-lang.org/guide/for.html > > Robby > > On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Brad Long <b...@longbrothers.net> wrote: >> Dear racketeers, >> >> What is the reason for not offering a looping construct in racket? For >> example, something like: >> >> (loop (i 1 10) (print i)) >> >> Just for the masses, it seems simpler to use. >> >> Any comments? >> >> _________________________________________________ >> For list-related administrative tasks: >> http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users >> > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
