Please see 'for' in the docs. Here's the relevant section of the Guide: http://docs.racket-lang.org/guide/for.html
Robby On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Brad Long <b...@longbrothers.net> wrote: > Dear racketeers, > > What is the reason for not offering a looping construct in racket? For > example, something like: > > (loop (i 1 10) (print i)) > > Just for the masses, it seems simpler to use. > > Any comments? > > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users > _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
