I'm on holiday at the moment. I will send you them - when i'm back in 2
weeks.
But would be more luckier, if yome of the devolopers seem to care. Cause
qpsmtpd is a real great program i think... and it should be stable in a
new release and not that buggy as it is... i think this is really sad /
bad or whatever.
Stefan
Ed McLain schrieb:
I'm all for any changes you have. I found most, I think, of the issues on
our beta system had to do with some of the plugins, not sure though.. If you
have any patches though I'd be open to trying to them out. I gotta do
something. We currently have 8 3Ghz ( single cpu/dual core) boxes with 2GB
of ram running 18-25 connections per second. With prefork I can steadily
maintain 20 with a load average of 2, w00t.
On 8/15/07 4:35 PM, "Stefan Priebe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello!
But be careful - the 0.40 preforkserver version has MANY MANY BUGS!!! We
tried to use it for about 500 servers with over 10 000 connections / 10
minutes - and it wasn't useable at all.
We've now changed many lines - in the code and it works well. I've
already posts some messages to the list but nobody seems to care - so ...
Stefan
Fred Moyer schrieb:
Ed McLain wrote:
I actually did a full testing of qpsmtpd-apache vs forkserver when I
first
started building this cluster and the apache version just had way to much
overhead. Basically it couldn't handle the connections per second we
were
throwing it. I asked the list for some help at that time, as I was
thinking
my config could be off, but never really got any. I've got a test box
going
with 0.40 and the pre-fork server now and it seems much better.
Oh cool, good to know. I looked through the changes for 0.40 and didn't
make the distinction between forkserver and pre-fork server until I read
your response. Time for me to upgrade to 0.40!
