I'm all for any changes you have. I found most, I think, of the issues on our beta system had to do with some of the plugins, not sure though.. If you have any patches though I'd be open to trying to them out. I gotta do something. We currently have 8 3Ghz ( single cpu/dual core) boxes with 2GB of ram running 18-25 connections per second. With prefork I can steadily maintain 20 with a load average of 2, w00t.
On 8/15/07 4:35 PM, "Stefan Priebe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello! > > But be careful - the 0.40 preforkserver version has MANY MANY BUGS!!! We > tried to use it for about 500 servers with over 10 000 connections / 10 > minutes - and it wasn't useable at all. > > We've now changed many lines - in the code and it works well. I've > already posts some messages to the list but nobody seems to care - so ... > > Stefan > > Fred Moyer schrieb: >> Ed McLain wrote: >>> I actually did a full testing of qpsmtpd-apache vs forkserver when I >>> first >>> started building this cluster and the apache version just had way to much >>> overhead. Basically it couldn't handle the connections per second we >>> were >>> throwing it. I asked the list for some help at that time, as I was >>> thinking >>> my config could be off, but never really got any. I've got a test box >>> going >>> with 0.40 and the pre-fork server now and it seems much better. >> >> Oh cool, good to know. I looked through the changes for 0.40 and didn't >> make the distinction between forkserver and pre-fork server until I read >> your response. Time for me to upgrade to 0.40! > -- Ed McLain Sr. Data Center Engineer TekLinks, Inc. 205.314.6634 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
