Hello, Thursday, August 19, 2004, 3:03:27 PM, John Peacock wrote: > On the subject of forkserver, here is my run file:
thanks, > with the appropriate values. I've been very happy with it, but then again I > haven't done any metrics to see if it is faster/slower than pperl... do you use forkserver in a production environment? what's the number of smtp transactions/day? I'm thinking about switching to qpsmtpd on a webhosting servers (~10k smtp transaction/day/mailserver) and am concerened about the possible problems with pperl (but as said before I haven't any so far, but it's on different machine with some 1k smtp connection/day) and simply can't decide, what's the best option, if -forkserver or pperl -- spaze -- exploited.cz -- tojeono.cz - forget everything and remember! -
