On 21 Aug 2004, at 17:17, Mark Powell wrote:
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004, Ask Bj�rn Hansen wrote:
It's an ancient dual ~800MHz pentium 3. The biggest contributor to the load is running spamassassin[1]. The load is generally hovering between 1 and 2.
Could you explain the merits of forkserver over PPerl? It still seems a little unclear which one to go for.
It goes like this:
- tcpserver - stablest, slowest. - forkserver - stable, fast. - pperl - concerns over stability, fastest.
I think I can probably fix the problems with pperl though - there are circular refs in qpsmtpd which don't need to be there.
Matt.
