On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 10:01:44AM -0400, peter green wrote:
[snip]
> What is actually parsing that format these days? I can appreciate
> forward-looking policies like qsbmf, but that doesn't exactly fly with
> customers all of the time. What can I point to as a definite reason (*now*)
> to keep qsbmf?

ezmlm parses qsmbf.

Greetz, Peter
-- 
Against Free Sex!   http://www.dataloss.nl/Megahard_en.html

Reply via email to