peter green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Please don't. That message has a very specific format, to allow it to be
> > recognized and parsed automatically. The format is documented at:
> > http://cr.yp.to/proto/qsbmf.txt
>
> What is actually parsing that format these days? I can appreciate
> forward-looking policies like qsbmf, but that doesn't exactly fly with
> customers all of the time. What can I point to as a definite reason (*now*)
> to keep qsbmf?
Peter van Dijk mentioned that ezmlm parses QSBMF. However, the bigger
question is "What is the the definite reason (*now*) for _not_ keeping QSBMF?"
I have seen lots of people who say they want to change the content of qmail's
bounce messages, but no one has ever been able to give a good reason why.
The current message is informative, clear, and concise. What else could you
want?
Charles
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
