On Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 11:00:19PM +0100, Peter van Dijk wrote:
| On Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 12:20:37PM -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
| > "Edward J. Allen III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > > There is nothing wrong with incorporating common patches into the
| > > distribution. This is how open source development works.
| >
| > qmail is not open source. It does not obey condition 3 of the Open
| > Source Definition:
| > http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition.html
|
| Open Source is something else than open source.
|
| qmail is open source.
|
| qmail is not Open Source.
|
| Please do not respond, this subject has been discussed over and over.
|
| Greetz, Peter.
|
Peter this is your second mail in this thread telling
other to "Please stop this thread"..
If something has been discussed before on the list why can't we discuss it again?
--
.Fredrik Steen
- http://www.stone.nu -
PGP signature
