On Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 12:20:37PM -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > "Edward J. Allen III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > There is nothing wrong with incorporating common patches into the > > distribution. This is how open source development works. > > qmail is not open source. It does not obey condition 3 of the Open > Source Definition: > http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition.html Open Source is something else than open source. qmail is open source. qmail is not Open Source. Please do not respond, this subject has been discussed over and over. Greetz, Peter.
- New qmail version request Balazs Nagy
- Re: New qmail version request Peter van Dijk
- Re: New qmail version request Balazs Nagy
- Re: New qmail version request Paco Gracia
- Re: New qmail version request Peter van Dijk
- Re: New qmail version request Edward J. Allen III
- Re: New qmail version request Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: New qmail version request Peter van Dijk
- Re: New qmail version request Fredrik Steen
- Re: New qmail version reques... Frank Tegtmeyer
- Re: New qmail version reques... Fredrik Steen
- Re: New qmail version re... David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: New qmail version request Todd A. Jacobs
- Re: New qmail version request Balazs Nagy
- Re: New qmail version request Dion_Vansevenant
- Re: New qmail version request Paco Gracia
- Re: New qmail version request Davi
- Re: New qmail version request Dave Sill
