<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Please forgive my naivete as I am new to qmail and this list, but hearing a >statement such as yours, Peter, gives me pause to consider: If there may >not be future development, am I betting on a dead (or dying) horse? Dan's got plans for qmail, he just hasn't released anything recently. >What is wrong with some of the requests that have been asked for? Some are for things that Dan has already explained why he doesn't like them. Others are for things you can already do easily enough. Still others are just bad ideas. Yes, that leaves a handful of good ideas. What's the probability that Dan hasn't already thought of them? Not very high. By all means, discuss features you'd like to see in the next release. Just don't be surprised if they don't make it. -Dave
- Re: New qmail version request Fredrik Steen
- Re: New qmail version request Frank Tegtmeyer
- Re: New qmail version request Fredrik Steen
- Re: New qmail version request David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: New qmail version request Todd A. Jacobs
- Re: New qmail version request Balazs Nagy
- Re: New qmail version request Dion_Vansevenant
- Re: New qmail version request Paco Gracia
- Re: New qmail version request Davi
- Re: New qmail version request Dave Sill
- Re: New qmail version request Dave Sill
- Re: New qmail version request Charles Cazabon
- Re: New qmail version request Chris Garrigues
- Re: New qmail version request Peter van Dijk
- Re: New qmail version request Scott Gifford
- Re: New qmail version request Mark Lane
- Re: New qmail version request Charles Cazabon
- Re: New qmail version request Mark Delany
- Re: New qmail version request Charles Cazabon
- Re: New qmail version request Mark Delany
- Re: New qmail version request Balazs Nagy
