Dave Sill wrote: > In that case, qmail is not strictly RFC822 compliant in rejecting > messages with bare linefeeds. Apparently Dan felt that the effort > necessary to allow messages to contain LF's was more trouble than it > was worth--especially considered that 822bis prohibits bare LF's. > This basically answers my question. My only other query would be as to what made allowing messages to contain LFs so troublesome. Any specific reasons? Thanks much, Jamie Blondin
- Solaris / DoS / Broken bare LF mailers / thousands of q... Andrew
- Re: Solaris / DoS / Broken bare LF mailers / thous... Charles Cazabon
- Re: Solaris / DoS / Broken bare LF mailers / thous... Jamie Heilman
- RE: Solaris / DoS / Broken bare LF mailers / t... James Blondin
- RE: Solaris / DoS / Broken bare LF mailers... Dave Sill
- Re: Solaris / DoS / Broken bare LF mai... Michael T. Babcock
- Re: Solaris / DoS / Broken bare L... Dave Sill
- RE: Solaris / DoS / Broken ba... James Blondin
- RE: Solaris / DoS / Broke... Dave Sill
- RE: Solaris / DoS / Broke... James Blondin
- RE: Solaris / DoS / Broke... Dave Sill
- RE: Solaris / DoS / Broke... James Blondin
- RE: Solaris / DoS / Broken bare LF mailers / thous... Andrew Richards
- RE: Solaris / DoS / Broken bare LF mailers / t... Petr Novotny
