[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >The 'problem' as it relates to RFCs, not to Qmail's implementation, >is probably the original question. Probably? If you don't know, why bother guessing? I answered the question I thought was asked. If the person who asked the question isn't satisfied with that answer, he can say so. -Dave
- Solaris / DoS / Broken bare LF mailers / thousands of q... Andrew
- Re: Solaris / DoS / Broken bare LF mailers / thous... Charles Cazabon
- Re: Solaris / DoS / Broken bare LF mailers / thous... Jamie Heilman
- RE: Solaris / DoS / Broken bare LF mailers / t... James Blondin
- RE: Solaris / DoS / Broken bare LF mailers... Dave Sill
- Re: Solaris / DoS / Broken bare LF mai... Michael T. Babcock
- RE: Solaris / DoS / Broken bare L... Dave Sill
- RE: Solaris / DoS / Broken ba... James Blondin
- RE: Solaris / DoS / Broke... Dave Sill
- RE: Solaris / DoS / Broke... James Blondin
- RE: Solaris / DoS / Broke... Dave Sill
- RE: Solaris / DoS / Broke... James Blondin
- RE: Solaris / DoS / Broken bare LF mailers / thous... Andrew Richards
- RE: Solaris / DoS / Broken bare LF mailers / t... Petr Novotny
