Dave Sill wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >The 'problem' as it relates to RFCs, not to Qmail's implementation,
> >is probably the original question.
>
> Probably? If you don't know, why bother guessing? I answered the
> question I thought was asked. If the person who asked the question
> isn't satisfied with that answer, he can say so.
>

The answer you gave was useful, Dave, but although I didn't realize it at
first, my question is really relating to the RFCs more than to qmail's
implementation.  It's just that qmail's implementation of it led me to
asking the question.

I appreciate your information...

Jamie Blondin

Reply via email to