Jason Haar wrote: > If I cast my mind back, the reason such diagnostic data was put into a > Received: header was solely because Exchange-5.0 had a tendency to remove all > non-standard headers. > > However, I think it would be easier and more correct to stop using a > Received: header and make it a X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: header? > > Would that have any downside for anyone? Literally just changing a line?
Sounds good to me... Nils. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ uberSVN's rich system and user administration capabilities and model configuration take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. Learn more about uberSVN and get a free download at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Qmail-scanner-general mailing list Qmail-scanner-general@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
