>> Hi, >> >> I looked in the archives and saw that Will Saxon reported an issue with >> scans taking too long. I am administering a small site where I have >> similar issues. My system: >> >> >> Large mails apparently take a long time to finish scanning, and some >> appear never to finish. Here was my system today, after I logged in for >> the first time in about a week: >> >> 09:55:17 up 11 days, 20:01, 3 users, load average: 87.08, 86.94, 86.82 >> >> OUCH! I tried to run "top" or "ps fax" to see what was going on, but >> they never showed anything. So instead, on a hunch, I ran "killall >> clamscan", and here's the result: >> >> 09:59:44 up 11 days, 20:06, 3 users, load average: 40.82, 70.65, 80.83 >> 10:00:08 up 11 days, 20:06, 3 users, load average: 26.89, 64.98, 78.68 >> 10:00:40 up 11 days, 20:07, 3 users, load average: 16.29, 58.77, 76.18 >> 10:01:27 up 11 days, 20:07, 3 users, load average: 7.69, 50.54, 72.57 >> 10:02:04 up 11 days, 20:08, 3 users, load average: 3.94, 44.21, 69.51 >> 10:03:35 up 11 days, 20:10, 3 users, load average: 0.91, 32.72, 63.09 >> 10:06:05 up 11 days, 20:12, 3 users, load average: 0.07, 19.79, 53.67 >> 10:25:00 up 11 days, 20:31, 4 users, load average: 0.02, 1.18, 16.58 >>
Hi, I fee that, as a first measure, I would lower concurrencyincoming to the max number of parallel clam scans the machine will handle at reasonable loads Wolfgang Hamann ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today Register for a JBoss Training Course. Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit: http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7628&alloc_id=16845&op=click _______________________________________________ Qmail-scanner-general mailing list Qmail-scanner-general@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
