Will Saxon wrote: >I am wondering why we continue delivery after the sender has dropped >the connection. It seems like we should not deliver the message, >since the connection was dropped before we had time to say we >received the message. Is this something that qmail-scanner should be >involved in? I am not sure where I should be looking to fix this. > > >
There is code in Q-S that is meant to detect when the qmail-smtpd process that called it dies, maybe it isn't working. I'll take a look. The real question is why is clamd taking 20m+ to scan an email. What do its logs say is going on? Could it be a softlimits problem? -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 PGP Fingerprint: 7A2E 0407 C9A6 CAF6 2B9F 8422 C063 5EBB FE1D 66D1 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ Qmail-scanner-general mailing list Qmail-scanner-general@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
