> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Jim Maul > Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 5:35 PM > To: Scott Ryan > Cc: Qmail-scanner-general@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Scanning only the incomming mails > > Scott Ryan wrote: > > This one time, at band camp, Samir Noshy wrote: > > > >>>-----Original Message----- > >>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf > >>>Of Samir Noshy > >>>Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 3:43 PM > >>>To: 'Scott Ryan'; Qmail-scanner-general@lists.sourceforge.net > >>>Subject: RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Scanning only the > incomming mails > >>> > >>> > >>>>-----Original Message----- > >>>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> > >>>On Behalf > >>> > >>>>Of Scott Ryan > >>>>Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 3:33 PM > >>>>To: Qmail-scanner-general@lists.sourceforge.net > >>>>Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Scanning only the > >>> > >>>incomming mails > >>> > >>>>This one time, at band camp, Samir Noshy wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>>-----Original Message----- > >>>>>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf > >>>> > >>>>>>Of Scott Ryan > >>>>>>Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 3:13 PM > >>>>>>To: Qmail-scanner-general@lists.sourceforge.net > >>>>>>Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Scanning only the incomming > >>>>>>mails > >>>>>> > >>>>>>This one time, at band camp, Samir Noshy wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>Hi Everybody, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>I also tried to reconfigure my qmail-scanner-1.24 with > >>>> > >>>>the option : > >>>> > >>>>>>> --scanners clamdscan,fast_spamassassin=[SPAM] > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>But Also no enhancements in the performance issue ; i.e. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>the message > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>also still Processed in more than 10 Secs (and I am sending > >>>>>> > >>>>>>through my > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>local network). > >>>>>> > >>>>>>You delay is most likely caused by spamassassin. I notice that > >>>>>>spamassassin is very slow and for that reason I do not > >>> > >>>scan every > >>> > >>>>>>incoming mail. I setup maildrop and do the spamassassin > >>> > >>>scanning > >>> > >>>>>>there. > >>>>> > >>>>>How can do that ?? > >>>> > >>>>First you must know how to use maildrop or procmail (or > some other > >>>>kind of filtering app) > >>>> > >>>>I use qmail-ldap and set my deliveryprogrampath=maildrop > >>> > >>><filterfile> > >>> > >>>>where filterfile is the name of my maildrop filter file > that tells > >>>>maildrop to run the message through spamc. I also set the > >>> > >>>deliverymode > >>> > >>>>attribute to 'nolocal' to prevent duplicate mails. > >>>> > >>>>If you are not using qmail-ldap I am sure you can use > >>> > >>>dot-qmail files > >>> > >>>>to do the same job. eg: > >>>># cat /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-someuser > >>>>|maildrop filterfile > >>> > >>>OK , I ll try that. > >>> > >>>I tried something else which to disable the razor2 checking in my > >>>/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf . > >>>Do you think that this razor2 checking or any other > network checking > >>>is important ??????????? > >>> > >>> > >>>Thanks and Best Regards. > >>> > >>> Samir Noshy. > >> > >> > >>Also Attache my verbose razor-check on a spam email. > >>It takes about 10 Seconds to complete ...!!!!!!! > > > > <snip> > > > > I dont use it. I dont really like spamassassin... > > > > > I love how people have a problem and instantly blame the > program itself with claims like "Spamassassin is slow!!" > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] spamassassin]# tail -50 /var/log/spamassassin/spamd > > Jul 12 09:41:08 external spamd[18393]: identified spam (16.6/5.0) for > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:512 in 1.5 seconds, 6953 bytes. > Jul 12 09:43:16 external spamd[16137]: connection from localhost > [127.0.0.1] at port 39262 > Jul 12 09:43:16 external spamd[18420]: processing message > <LYRIS-2332590-1901-2005.07.12-09.00.37--info.netsweepstakesnews.com> > for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:512. > Jul 12 09:43:19 external spamd[18420]: identified spam (15.1/5.0) for > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:512 in 2.7 seconds, 1789 bytes. > Jul 12 09:43:21 external spamd[16137]: connection from localhost > [127.0.0.1] at port 39264 > Jul 12 09:43:21 external spamd[18436]: processing message > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:512. > Jul 12 09:43:22 external spamd[18436]: clean message (-1.1/5.0) for > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:512 in 1.0 seconds, 146747 bytes. > Jul 12 09:43:59 external spamd[16137]: connection from localhost > [127.0.0.1] at port 39266 > Jul 12 09:43:59 external spamd[18454]: processing message > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:512. > Jul 12 09:44:01 external spamd[18454]: identified spam (18.3/5.0) for > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:512 in 2.6 seconds, 6974 bytes. > Jul 12 09:44:04 external spamd[16137]: connection from localhost > [127.0.0.1] at port 39269 > Jul 12 09:44:04 external spamd[18472]: processing message > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:512. > Jul 12 09:44:05 external spamd[18472]: clean message (-2.1/5.0) for > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:512 in 0.8 seconds, 2062 bytes. > Jul 12 09:45:10 external spamd[16137]: connection from localhost > [127.0.0.1] at port 39271 > Jul 12 09:45:10 external spamd[18539]: processing message > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:512. > Jul 12 09:45:12 external spamd[18539]: identified spam (26.3/5.0) for > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:512 in 2.0 seconds, 20620 bytes. > Jul 12 09:46:00 external spamd[16137]: connection from localhost > [127.0.0.1] at port 39274 > Jul 12 09:46:00 external spamd[18559]: processing message > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:512. > Jul 12 09:46:01 external spamd[18559]: identified spam (15.1/5.0) for > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:512 in 1.5 seconds, 6964 bytes. > Jul 12 09:47:24 external spamd[16137]: connection from localhost > [127.0.0.1] at port 39277 > Jul 12 09:47:24 external spamd[18580]: processing message > (unknown) for > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:512. > Jul 12 09:47:25 external spamd[18580]: identified spam (25.9/5.0) for > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:512 in 1.0 seconds, 14242 bytes. > Jul 12 09:50:06 external spamd[16137]: connection from localhost > [127.0.0.1] at port 39284 > Jul 12 09:50:06 external spamd[18688]: processing message > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:512. > Jul 12 09:50:10 external spamd[18688]: identified spam (19.0/5.0) for > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:512 in 4.0 seconds, 6942 bytes. > Jul 12 09:54:36 external spamd[16137]: connection from localhost > [127.0.0.1] at port 39292 > Jul 12 09:54:36 external spamd[18791]: processing message > <LYRIS-218160-271495-2005.07.12-09.40.02--hcproinc.com> for > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:512. > Jul 12 09:54:37 external spamd[18791]: clean message (0.5/5.0) for > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:512 in 1.6 seconds, 13601 bytes. > Jul 12 09:54:46 external spamd[16137]: connection from localhost > [127.0.0.1] at port 39294 > Jul 12 09:54:46 external spamd[18809]: processing message > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:512. > Jul 12 09:54:48 external spamd[18809]: identified spam (16.6/5.0) for > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:512 in 1.4 seconds, 6909 bytes. > > > I dont see anything over 4.0 seconds there with the average > around 2.0 > seconds maybe? This is with extra SARE rules, razor, and > URIBL lookups. > This is running on a p4 2.8ghz with 512mb ram. > > Perhaps you have a dns issue or other generals problems with your > network connection? Or maybe a configuration issue with SA > itself? Is > your machine underpowered for your mail load? Maybe you should ask a > question on the SA mailing list to see if anyone can help there? > > All just suggestions... I agree with you , I think that is something is misconfigured because the following command: # razor-check --verbose sample-spam.txt gives me the following:
Razor-Log: Computed razorhome from env: /root/.razor Razor-Log: No razorhome found, using all defaults Which make the delay. ;) Best Regards. Samir Noshy. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar happening July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in dual core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted by HP, AMD, and NVIDIA. To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar _______________________________________________ Qmail-scanner-general mailing list Qmail-scanner-general@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
