Scott Ryan wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Samir Noshy wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Samir Noshy
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 3:43 PM
To: 'Scott Ryan'; Qmail-scanner-general@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Qmail-scanner-general]Scanning only the incomming mails
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf
Of Scott Ryan
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 3:33 PM
To: Qmail-scanner-general@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Scanning only the
incomming mails
This one time, at band camp, Samir Noshy wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Scott Ryan
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 3:13 PM
To: Qmail-scanner-general@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general]Scanning only the incomming
mails
This one time, at band camp, Samir Noshy wrote:
Hi Everybody,
I also tried to reconfigure my qmail-scanner-1.24 with
the option :
--scanners clamdscan,fast_spamassassin=[SPAM]
But Also no enhancements in the performance issue ; i.e.
the message
also still Processed in more than 10 Secs (and I am sending
through my
local network).
You delay is most likely caused by spamassassin. I notice that
spamassassin is very slow and for that reason I do not
scan every
incoming mail. I setup maildrop and do the spamassassin
scanning
there.
How can do that ??
First you must know how to use maildrop or procmail (or some other
kind of filtering app)
I use qmail-ldap and set my deliveryprogrampath=maildrop
<filterfile>
where filterfile is the name of my maildrop filter file that tells
maildrop to run the message through spamc. I also set the
deliverymode
attribute to 'nolocal' to prevent duplicate mails.
If you are not using qmail-ldap I am sure you can use
dot-qmail files
to do the same job. eg:
# cat /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-someuser
|maildrop filterfile
OK , I ll try that.
I tried something else which to disable the razor2 checking
in my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf .
Do you think that this razor2 checking or any other network
checking is important ???????????
Thanks and Best Regards.
Samir Noshy.
Also Attache my verbose razor-check on a spam email.
It takes about 10 Seconds to complete ...!!!!!!!
<snip>
I dont use it. I dont really like spamassassin...
I love how people have a problem and instantly blame the program itself
with claims like "Spamassassin is slow!!"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] spamassassin]# tail -50 /var/log/spamassassin/spamd
Jul 12 09:41:08 external spamd[18393]: identified spam (16.6/5.0) for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:512 in 1.5 seconds, 6953 bytes.
Jul 12 09:43:16 external spamd[16137]: connection from localhost
[127.0.0.1] at port 39262
Jul 12 09:43:16 external spamd[18420]: processing message
<LYRIS-2332590-1901-2005.07.12-09.00.37--info.netsweepstakesnews.com>
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:512.
Jul 12 09:43:19 external spamd[18420]: identified spam (15.1/5.0) for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:512 in 2.7 seconds, 1789 bytes.
Jul 12 09:43:21 external spamd[16137]: connection from localhost
[127.0.0.1] at port 39264
Jul 12 09:43:21 external spamd[18436]: processing message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:512.
Jul 12 09:43:22 external spamd[18436]: clean message (-1.1/5.0) for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:512 in 1.0 seconds, 146747 bytes.
Jul 12 09:43:59 external spamd[16137]: connection from localhost
[127.0.0.1] at port 39266
Jul 12 09:43:59 external spamd[18454]: processing message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:512.
Jul 12 09:44:01 external spamd[18454]: identified spam (18.3/5.0) for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:512 in 2.6 seconds, 6974 bytes.
Jul 12 09:44:04 external spamd[16137]: connection from localhost
[127.0.0.1] at port 39269
Jul 12 09:44:04 external spamd[18472]: processing message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:512.
Jul 12 09:44:05 external spamd[18472]: clean message (-2.1/5.0) for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:512 in 0.8 seconds, 2062 bytes.
Jul 12 09:45:10 external spamd[16137]: connection from localhost
[127.0.0.1] at port 39271
Jul 12 09:45:10 external spamd[18539]: processing message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:512.
Jul 12 09:45:12 external spamd[18539]: identified spam (26.3/5.0) for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:512 in 2.0 seconds, 20620 bytes.
Jul 12 09:46:00 external spamd[16137]: connection from localhost
[127.0.0.1] at port 39274
Jul 12 09:46:00 external spamd[18559]: processing message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:512.
Jul 12 09:46:01 external spamd[18559]: identified spam (15.1/5.0) for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:512 in 1.5 seconds, 6964 bytes.
Jul 12 09:47:24 external spamd[16137]: connection from localhost
[127.0.0.1] at port 39277
Jul 12 09:47:24 external spamd[18580]: processing message (unknown) for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:512.
Jul 12 09:47:25 external spamd[18580]: identified spam (25.9/5.0) for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:512 in 1.0 seconds, 14242 bytes.
Jul 12 09:50:06 external spamd[16137]: connection from localhost
[127.0.0.1] at port 39284
Jul 12 09:50:06 external spamd[18688]: processing message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:512.
Jul 12 09:50:10 external spamd[18688]: identified spam (19.0/5.0) for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:512 in 4.0 seconds, 6942 bytes.
Jul 12 09:54:36 external spamd[16137]: connection from localhost
[127.0.0.1] at port 39292
Jul 12 09:54:36 external spamd[18791]: processing message
<LYRIS-218160-271495-2005.07.12-09.40.02--hcproinc.com> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:512.
Jul 12 09:54:37 external spamd[18791]: clean message (0.5/5.0) for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:512 in 1.6 seconds, 13601 bytes.
Jul 12 09:54:46 external spamd[16137]: connection from localhost
[127.0.0.1] at port 39294
Jul 12 09:54:46 external spamd[18809]: processing message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:512.
Jul 12 09:54:48 external spamd[18809]: identified spam (16.6/5.0) for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:512 in 1.4 seconds, 6909 bytes.
I dont see anything over 4.0 seconds there with the average around 2.0
seconds maybe? This is with extra SARE rules, razor, and URIBL lookups.
This is running on a p4 2.8ghz with 512mb ram.
Perhaps you have a dns issue or other generals problems with your
network connection? Or maybe a configuration issue with SA itself? Is
your machine underpowered for your mail load? Maybe you should ask a
question on the SA mailing list to see if anyone can help there?
All just suggestions...
-Jim
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar happening
July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in dual
core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted by HP,
AMD, and NVIDIA. To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar
_______________________________________________
Qmail-scanner-general mailing list
Qmail-scanner-general@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
