> Guys, I know what it's not a perfect solution. It's not that I don't > want to patch qmail, as I said I find myself in a position (which I know > a lot of other people are in) where compiling is just not an option. > > Even not giving the politically correct error numbers, rejecting the > message saying that we have reason to believe the message is SPAM.
Well, this is not an standard qmail messages... ;-) Are you sure that your qmail-smtpd answer with that code? > I don't mind missing one or two emails which are incorrectly addressed, > 99% of the mail that comes in like this is spam. Since having to > support our mail services, I have decided the only thing to do is get > tough on spam. > If I had understand well you are using something named Plesk. Are your users mailbox in the same host as qmail-scanner? How Plesk mantains the users mailbox? If it uses vpopmail, it won't be too dificult (for only one_recip) to patch the st version tho check for the user validity after the routine grabenvelop_headers and call the reject routine. Maybe you can ask for it at the Plesk people or do it yourself. Cheers ST mail1.usc.urbe.it ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ Qmail-scanner-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
