Thanks, Dan. I've put them in place straight away - "2" in each and sighupped qmail. I also have concurrencyincoming set to 20 - any comments? It seems simply using the RH/KDE "runaway process catcher" the box is stable. Any downside?
Tim Clarke -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Czarnecki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 April 2004 11:52 To: Tim Clarke Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general](no subject) Have you tried to set the concurrency limits? In /var/qmail/control create a file called concurrencyremote and concurrencysmtpd. The contents looks like this.... [EMAIL PROTECTED] control]# cat concurrencyremote 2 I know under load on slower machines qmail comes to a griding halt when a whole lot of qmail-scanner instances are running. If your CPU is being hoged and you have many smtpd connections the qmail-scanner processes will be starved and thus causing your box to grind to a halt. The output below seems ok. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id149&alloc_id66&op=click _______________________________________________ Qmail-scanner-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general