Thanks, Dan.
I've put them in place straight away - "2" in each and sighupped qmail.
I also have concurrencyincoming set to 20 - any comments? It seems
simply using the RH/KDE "runaway process catcher" the box is stable. Any
downside?

Tim Clarke

-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Czarnecki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 29 April 2004 11:52
To: Tim Clarke
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Qmail-scanner-general](no subject)


Have you tried to set the concurrency limits?

In /var/qmail/control create a file called concurrencyremote and
concurrencysmtpd. The contents looks like this....

[EMAIL PROTECTED] control]# cat concurrencyremote
2

I know under load on slower machines qmail comes to a griding halt when
a whole lot of qmail-scanner instances are running. If your CPU is being
hoged and you have many smtpd connections the qmail-scanner processes
will be starved and thus causing your box to grind to a halt.

The output below seems ok.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id149&alloc_id66&op=click
_______________________________________________
Qmail-scanner-general mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general

Reply via email to