On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 05:09:39PM -0500, Dallas L. Engelken wrote: > First of all, this is not a debate...
I think it is. I think this is *exactly* the place to debate such things. Where else should such thing be discussed? > Personally, I 550 for the simple fact that its less overhead than > forking a call to qmail-queue to inject (a|several) custom crafted > notification message. Does that make it better? Maybe.. Maybe not. > It depends what you are comparing I guess! That is the only real positive argument I have ever seen for this. It is ever-so-slightly more resource efficient. However, as I know that only 2% of our e-mail is viruses (owch - I just looked that up - that's a lot higher than I thought!), the "extra resource" required really is tiny. I realise that's very site-dependent... The reality is all of our queues are stuffed full of bounced SPAM - not virus alerts... > Loosen up man... Gotta be kidding. I'm runnin' on coffee this week... -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 PGP Fingerprint: 7A2E 0407 C9A6 CAF6 2B9F 8422 C063 5EBB FE1D 66D1 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562&alloc_id=6184&op=click _______________________________________________ Qmail-scanner-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
