On Friday 30 January 2004 10:07, Salvatore Toribio wrote:
1) The lastest viruses/worms always use a faked sender. Notifications??
The notifications on my site goes always to the "recipient". Because:
No notification at all is bad in case the mail is a 'false positive'.
Notification the sender is a very bad ideas, because all "From:" in the latest generation of viruses are fake adresses. It would hit the same person.
The recipient could easily filter the (short and harmless) virus notifications.
Sending all those notification to the recipient is worse than spam... This is my point of view.
2) If a virus scanner finds a virus, Is it useful to quarantine it?
No, but it could be a false positive.
A false positive from a virus scanner??? And how can you check it?
3) I can reject a virus in the smtp session instead of notifying the sender...
This would be a great idea.
4) Woul be useful to add a "delete_virus_array" similar at "silent_virus_array"?
Yes. Good idea.
Salvatore
------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Qmail-scanner-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
